lolaraincoat: (badger)
lolaraincoat ([personal profile] lolaraincoat) wrote2007-06-13 10:09 am
Entry tags:

PSA

Fifteen months ago -- as some of you may recall -- I lost a beloved colleague and friend to ovarian cancer that was detected (as most cases are) too late to save her, but not too late to put her through four torturous years of chemo, fear, pain, weakness and wasting before she died. I miss her every day.

This NY Times article goes into some detail about the results of a new study about the possibility of early detection of ovarian cancer. It says that the symptoms to watch for are bloating, pelvic or abdominal pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly and feeling a frequent or urgent need to urinate. A woman who has any of those problems nearly every day for more than two or three weeks is advised to see a gynecologist, especially if the symptoms are new and quite different from her usual state of health.

It also warns that doctors may try to convince women that it's all in our heads, or that these are menopause symptoms. If you have these symptoms, please, be stubborn: insist on a full pelvic/rectal workup, including transvaginal ultrasound. These are cheap and essentially painless interventions that can save your life. And the difference between early and late detection is a matter of two or three months, so don't dawdle and don't let your doctor dawdle either.

I don't want to have to miss you, too.

[identity profile] spare-change.livejournal.com 2007-06-14 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks for posting the PSA. Although I have to admit I'm a bit befuddled by this. These symptoms have been long known to be markers of ovarian cancer. Is it just a question of publicizing them, and forcing doctors and patients to take them more seriously? That's certainly important, but it's nonetheless weird for this to be presented as "new" information.

I should also add, though, that by the time a woman has symptoms, no matter how vague, the ovarian cancer will have already progressed quite a bit. That's one of the many things that makes it so deadly.

Yearly CA-125 tests and transvaginal ultrasounds are a good idea for anyone at risk. As is getting your ovaries removed once you're done using them.

posting uncaffeinated

[identity profile] spare-change.livejournal.com 2007-06-14 11:51 am (UTC)(link)
Just to clarify: I meant it was weird for the NYT and the medical researchers to be presenting this as new information; not for you to be posting about it. ;)