One of us! One of us!
Jul. 12th, 2007 07:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, my brother's wedding was just unspeakably depressing, so let us not speak of it. Heteronormativity gives me an itchy rash, but you knew that. Let us -- and by us I mean me -- instead give thanks to those who cheered me up after, in 24 hours in the City That Cheers Me Up:
bowdlerized,
cubby66,
stillwell, Matty O., Amanda,
twotoedsloth and
idlerat most of all. I love you and miss you and miss everyone I didn't get to see, too.
But that's not what I wanted to post about. What I wanted to post about is Julie Phillips' biography of the science fiction writer James Tiptree Jr./Alice B. Sheldon. It's not a great book, but it's fascinating me. Phillips is a fine journalist but not a historian, and so she has some difficulty distinguishing what's unusual about Tiptree's life from what's typical for Cold-War era women of Tiptree's race and class. This makes the book a little baggy and shapeless.
The details are gorgeous, though. Phillips quotes extensively from the (apparently voluminous) correspondence between Tiptree and Joanna Russ, and Tiptree and Ursala LeGuin. It was your basic lj-type conversation, smart, flirtatious, wideranging, and with identities of all sorts in play. Also, at least one threat of psuedocide. Internet fandom avant la letre! Seriously, it made me think hard about the historical roots of what we do here, how we adapted the internet to our own purposes rather than having our lives revolutionized by new technology.
The detail I loved most, though, will matter to only a few of you - but those who care will care a whole lot, I bet. So in 1975 Jeff Smith -- a fan who became Tiptree's friend and literary executor -- organized and published a written "symposium" on gender and feminism in science fiction. He came up with a list of questions and then a bunch of writers responded, and then he circulated all the responses and the authors struck up a conversation by mail that (mostly) ended up in print. It wasn't, as far as I can see, all that different from what you might find on the web, a few clicks beyond Making Light or some such, except that the participants included Russ, LeGuin, Tiptree, Samuel Delaney, some SF authors I don't care so much about, and ... "African historian Luisa White." Yeah. Yeah! Luisa White -- who must then have been just starting graduate school -- is one of us.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
But that's not what I wanted to post about. What I wanted to post about is Julie Phillips' biography of the science fiction writer James Tiptree Jr./Alice B. Sheldon. It's not a great book, but it's fascinating me. Phillips is a fine journalist but not a historian, and so she has some difficulty distinguishing what's unusual about Tiptree's life from what's typical for Cold-War era women of Tiptree's race and class. This makes the book a little baggy and shapeless.
The details are gorgeous, though. Phillips quotes extensively from the (apparently voluminous) correspondence between Tiptree and Joanna Russ, and Tiptree and Ursala LeGuin. It was your basic lj-type conversation, smart, flirtatious, wideranging, and with identities of all sorts in play. Also, at least one threat of psuedocide. Internet fandom avant la letre! Seriously, it made me think hard about the historical roots of what we do here, how we adapted the internet to our own purposes rather than having our lives revolutionized by new technology.
The detail I loved most, though, will matter to only a few of you - but those who care will care a whole lot, I bet. So in 1975 Jeff Smith -- a fan who became Tiptree's friend and literary executor -- organized and published a written "symposium" on gender and feminism in science fiction. He came up with a list of questions and then a bunch of writers responded, and then he circulated all the responses and the authors struck up a conversation by mail that (mostly) ended up in print. It wasn't, as far as I can see, all that different from what you might find on the web, a few clicks beyond Making Light or some such, except that the participants included Russ, LeGuin, Tiptree, Samuel Delaney, some SF authors I don't care so much about, and ... "African historian Luisa White." Yeah. Yeah! Luisa White -- who must then have been just starting graduate school -- is one of us.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 01:20 am (UTC)Tip must have been an absolute *stitch* to correspond with.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 01:49 am (UTC)And *snicker* I knew there was a reason I liked Luise White!!!!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 07:18 am (UTC)The story B tells to this day is that I used the word heteropatriarchy the first time I met her mom (years before we started dating). In retrospective, it's hysterical (all the more so because it made her mom assume I was a lesbian (that plus my short hair ;), so B went on to explain about my boyfriend, blowing her mom's mind a second time), but at the time I was just that earnest that I didn't pause to consider my audience.
I miss you when I'm not on lj much.
That written "symposium" sounds really interesting actually, given the people involved. Even though you're right, a lot of the same ideas can be found online these days. I'll have to track down the biography (or is it published in another form?).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 06:24 pm (UTC)There's been an vast upwelling of usage of the word heteronormativity, I've noticed, in the context of discussion of the new Potter book.
And yes, I've been trying to track down that "symposium," which apparently was reprinted in some slightly more formal way than a low-circulation fanzine. But the book's citations and bibliography are -- here's a real historians' putdown -- vague and disorganized, so I don't have much to go on.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 06:28 am (UTC)Vague and disorganized, say it isn't so! I'll be crossing my fingers you can find it anyway.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-20 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-20 03:46 am (UTC)It's no problem. :) I almost forgot to post for my DE, so...
Um, except I'm falling asleep, so I'm gonna cut it off at 11, if you don't mind...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-20 03:50 am (UTC)helphelphelp (OT)
Date: 2007-07-20 04:01 pm (UTC)It's Harry and Petunia talking after the war, while the light turns funny colrs, as things start to shut down. Harry is grilling her for information about his mother. SHe is upset at what is happening. Her family is indoors, unaware, but she has a wee bit of magic in her so she knows what is going on.
I think the last word of the story is "Green." Does that ring a bell? Do you know where I can find this story?
Re: helphelphelp (OT)
Date: 2007-07-20 04:05 pm (UTC)Re: helphelphelp (OT)
Date: 2007-07-20 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 02:05 pm (UTC)Fishwhistle and I have the luxury of not marrying because as far as we can tell, in Canada, common-law status gives you exactly the same set of privileges and benefits as legal marriage (that's one reason why same-sex marriage has been so much less controversial here - same-sex common-law status already existed.) But if we were to move back to the States and it was a question of tax benefits or health insurance or protecting our interests in case of divorce ... oh, we would certainly be putting on the white dresses and waving bits of cake around, you bet.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-28 04:54 am (UTC)I'm sure I don't need to tell you that white wedding dresses only came into fashion because white was the fashionable color in the early 1800s, right?